-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src: use v8::LocalVector instead of MaybeStackBuffer<Value> #54934
Conversation
Review requested:
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
@@ -215,14 +216,14 @@ MaybeLocal<Value> InternalMakeCallback(Environment* env, | |||
|
|||
Local<Context> context = env->context(); | |||
if (use_async_hooks_trampoline) { | |||
MaybeStackBuffer<Local<Value>, 16> args(3 + argc); | |||
LocalVector<Value> args(env->isolate(), 3 + argc); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you benchmark this? The point of MaybeStackBuffer
is to avoid an extra heap allocation, as the name implies, a benefit that gets lost when switching to LocalVector
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we probably don't have a choice according to https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4905902 - the Local
handles are not supposed to be heap-allocated in the usual fashion, so a MaybeStackBuffer<Local<>>
that heap-allocates (when the size > kStackStorageSize) is invalid in the first place and we were probably just being lucky to dodge some memory failures that could be caused by it (or maybe we'll get hit when V8 enables conservative stack scanning). LocalVector
was added as a V8-acknowledged way to properly heap allocate them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although, another way to go with this while preserving the stack-allocation part may be to add a different MaybeStackBuffer
that uses LocalVector
when it goes heap-allocated, or add some specialization to MaybeStackBuffer
so that the heap-allocated part uses LocalVector
when the element type is Local
(seems messier though).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@joyeecheung Yeah, those sound like good ideas for solving this problem to me 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Q: How can we disallow heap allocation on Local handles? What's the best way?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's see if it breaks here as well. Thanks for the tip @targos: cloudflare/workerd#2752
7da2d30
to
a7bee9b
Compare
Closing given the feedback |
No description provided.